Onward! EssaysSPLASH 2023
Onward! Essays is looking for clear and compelling pieces of writing about topics important to the software community. An essay can be long or short.
An essay can be an exploration of the topic and its impact, or a story about the circumstances of its creation; it can present a personal view of what is, explore a terrain, or lead the reader in an act of discovery; it can be a philosophical digression or a deep analysis. It can describe a personal journey, perhaps the one the author took to reach an understanding of the topic. The subject area—software, programming, and programming languages—should be interpreted broadly and can include the relationship of software to human endeavors, or its philosophical, sociological, psychological, historical, or anthropological underpinnings.
Wed 25 OctDisplayed time zone: Lisbon change
09:00 - 10:30 | |||
09:00 90mKeynote | Creating a learnable and inclusive programming languageKeynote Onward! Papers |
11:00 - 12:30 | |||
11:00 30mTalk | Time-awareness in Object-exploration Tools: Toward In Situ Omniscient DebuggingRemote Onward! Papers Christoph Thiede Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Germany, Marcel Taeumel University of Potsdam; Hasso Plattner Institute, Robert Hirschfeld University of Potsdam; Hasso Plattner Institute Link to publication DOI | ||
11:30 30mTalk | Code Merging Using Transformations and Member Identity Onward! Papers André R. Teles University Institute of Lisbon, André L. Santos University Institute of Lisbon, Portugal | ||
12:00 30mTalk | Scalable Spreadsheet-driven End-User Applications with Incremental Computation Onward! Papers |
14:00 - 15:30 | |||
14:00 30mTalk | Could No-Code be Code? -- Toward a No-Code Programming Language for Citizen Developers Onward! Papers Link to publication DOI Pre-print | ||
14:30 30mTalk | Toward Programming Languages for Reasoning -- Humans, Symbolic Systems, and AI Agents Onward! Papers Mark Marron University of Kentucky | ||
15:00 30mTalk | Trustworthy Formal Natural Language Specifications Onward! Papers |
16:00 - 17:30 | Essays 1Onward! Essays at Room VII Chair(s): Matthew Dinmore Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory | ||
16:00 45mTalk | Will code remain a relevant user interface for end-user programming with generative AI models? Onward! Essays Advait Sarkar Microsoft Research and University of Cambridge Link to publication DOI | ||
16:45 45mTalk | programmingLanguage as Language; Onward! Essays Link to publication DOI File Attached |
Thu 26 OctDisplayed time zone: Lisbon change
11:00 - 12:30 | |||
11:00 30mTalk | Cloning And Beyond: A Quantum Solution to Duplicate Code Onward! Papers | ||
11:30 30mTalk | Towards an Industrial Stateful Software Rejuvenation Toolchain Using Model LearningRemote Onward! Papers | ||
12:00 30mTalk | Concept-Centric Software Development: An Experience Report Onward! Papers Peter Wilczynski Palantir Technologies, Taylor Gregoire-Wright Independent consultant, Daniel Jackson MIT |
14:00 - 15:30 | |||
14:00 45mTalk | Sharing a Perspective on the lambda-Calculus Onward! Essays Beniamino Accattoli Inria & Ecole Polytechnique Link to publication DOI | ||
14:45 45mTalk | Whither Problem-Solving Environments? Onward! Essays Matthew Dinmore Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory Link to publication DOI File Attached |
Accepted Essays
Call for Essays
Scope
Onward! Essays is looking for clear and compelling pieces of writing about topics important to the software community. An essay can be long or short.
An essay can be an exploration of the topic and its impact, or a story about the circumstances of its creation; it can present a personal view of what is, explore a terrain, or lead the reader in an act of discovery; it can be a philosophical digression or a deep analysis. It can describe a personal journey, perhaps the one the author took to reach an understanding of the topic. The subject area—software, programming, and programming languages—should be interpreted broadly and can include the relationship of software to human endeavors, or its philosophical, sociological, psychological, historical, or anthropological underpinnings.
Onward! Essays invites not only experienced academics but graduate students to submit essays with constructive criticism of current software development technology and practices, as well as presentations of ideas that could change the realm of software development. Practitioners who are dissatisfied—or satisfied!—with the state of our art are also encouraged to share insights about how to reform—or improve—software development, perhaps by presenting detailed examples of a new approach, demonstrating concrete benefits and potential risks.
Onward! Essays is not looking for research-as-usual papers—an essay doesn’t contain definitive validation; however, regardless of its form or topic, the essay must have “substance.” An essay may or may not have a conclusion, but it must provide some insight or compelling argument, either directly or indirectly stated; the reader should be left—perhaps after some reflection—in no doubt about the claimed insight or argument. The key characteristic of a successful essay is that it shows a keen mind coming to grips with a tough or intriguing problem in such a way that, as Virginia Woolf wrote, “it explains much and tells much.”
Long essays are fine, but essayists are encouraged to consider the virtues of short essays that deliver their points sharply and with precision. Essays as short as a single page are welcome at Onward! Essays. Short essays will be accorded the same status at Onward! Essays as longer ones.
Essays Selection
Onward! essays are peer-reviewed in a single-blind manner. Accepted essays will appear in the Onward! Proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. Submissions will be judged on the potential impact of the ideas and the quality of the presentation.
The Onward! Essays track follows a two-phase review process. This enables us to welcome contributions that contain promising material and have the potential to meet the conference’s standards, but which may fall short of this in their initial form. At the end of the first round, all essays will be either accepted normally, subject to revisions, or rejected outright. The authors of essays in the second category will get around one month to complete the requested revisions, at which point the original reviewers will decide on final acceptance or rejection. As usual, essays in the first category will also receive feedback from the reviewers, and the corresponding authors will be required to take that feedback into account for the final submission.
In order to facilitate the second round of review, authors of essays in need of major revisions will be requested to accompany their second submission with a cover letter mapping the requested revisions to specific parts of the essay. The program committee will use the cover letter and the revised submission to arrive at a final decision.
The second phase will only be used to elevate promising work to the conference’s standard, not to require additional work on essays already deemed up-to-standard.
Instructions for Authors
Essays should use the ACM SIGPLAN Conference acmart
Format, with the sigplan
and review
\documentclass
options. This produces two-column, 10pt files. If you use LaTeX or Word, please use the provided ACM SIGPLAN acmart
templates provided here. All submissions should be in PDF format. Authors need to ensure their submissions are legible when printed on a black and white printer and that colors remain distinct and font sizes are legible.
The following list describes the typical expectations for a submission.:
-
All submitted essays should conform to the formatting instructions unless there is a reason founded in the nature of the essay to do otherwise; in this case, please preface the essay with the reasons for the variation.
-
Essays must describe unpublished work that is not currently submitted for publication elsewhere as described by SIGPLAN’s Republication Policy. Submitters should also be aware of ACM’s Policy and Procedures on Plagiarism.
-
There is no limit on the length of submissions, but note that reviewers will not be obligated to read beyond the end of their interest. The main part of the final version should not exceed 14 pages unless there are two program committee members who believe the content requires a longer essay, and the quality of the writing is likely to sustain readers. If otherwise your final version is longer than those 25 pages, you must re-submit it before the final deadline so the program committee can reëxamine it. No limit is imposed on the bibliographic section or other appendices.
However, given the nature of the Onward! Essays track, we understand that authors of certain submissions might have special requirements. For example, if a contribution might require a different media (video, interactive presentation, or an art piece) or if there are any other concerns, please contact the PC Chair (or, if you prefer, a different member of the PC) to discuss the issue.
Submissions
Essays can be submitted via the Onward! Essays 2023 submissions page.